Not far from the truth. It was that generally, if people w/ different reasons preffered it, perhaps it was "better" in a sense
It strongly suggests it's conclusion. The elaboration of which requires more than 140 characters will fit.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
What reasoning for the "betterness" of a state could you present to a moral relativist that wasn't an aggregate of opinions?
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
They're relativists when its covenient, like when you propose a reason in opposition to their own subjective assessments
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.