You mean the overtly partisan memo written with incomplete knowledge of the information on which it was commenting on wasn't completely honest?! Say it ain't so!
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And if it reverts back to “not true” again, it is even more worster than if it had turned out to be true, which is already worse than if it turned out to be false the first time! Scary!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
5 ppl wrote the memo, including Trey Gowdy. You could have disclosed that. What I read was a far cry from disclosure of the kind that a Fed judge sd have seen, so I'm going w/Nunes at this point.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This article doesn't back up the title.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The Clinton campaign and DNC funding was not disclosed. Period.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Somebody remind me why I follow these hacks?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not seeing where in article that says the application stated as a fact that DNC and HRC paid for the “Dossier”. A footnote acknowledging the author(s) may have had political motivation doesn’t quite measure up to the same standard.
#MemogateThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wonder if
@hughhewitt is going to walk back his comments from the weekend. Or, are FISA judges so stupid that a warrant application made in Oct, that has a "political motivation" for one small piece of supporting evidence, they don't know it was Democrats?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.