This article is incorrect as I tried to point out to @streifftestate. He/she just blocked me because I stopped out his/she error. I point out again to @redstate. Article I judges number 12 and Article III number 157. Total is in fact 169 and not 152.
Factually incorrect. 

-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If the reporter who blocked actually fact checked his facts first then he would not have been embarrassed and blocked me. This trend of being sloppy and slack is all over modern media. Article III judges number 157 not 152. Article I judges number 12 (not even mentioned).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I wonder if
@redstate will correct the article to show the true number of all judges appointed. To the reporter who blocked me. As Ben Shapiro says facts do not care about your feelings
To the professional reporter. The facts would have made your article look better/impactThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.