So, I have pretty thick skin when it comes to online harassment, but something has been really bothering me.
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @gaywonk
Thanks so much for outlining all of this–we’re looking into it further. Sending you a DM now.
1,093 replies 94 retweets 4,573 likes -
Replying to @TeamYouTube @gaywonk
You only need to look as far as your terms of service. You know what you're supposed to do. Enforce your terms of service.
2 replies 5 retweets 145 likes -
Or as far as the First Amendment! Crowder has never called for violence or harassment against Carlos, there for his speech is covered under 1A.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RedRobbyD @HNHughson and
That’s not how the first amendment works. YouTube is a private platform - they can govern speech on their platform however they’d like.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Ye ole Private platform. Yes, you're correct. If Youtube finds that Crowder huwt wittle Carwos' feewings then they can kick him off. But, there was ZERO call to violence, ZERO call to harass. So if "private platforms" want to kick people off for name calling then twitter is done!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

