@razibkhan basing that in part on what she wrote (which I didn't totally get) and her explanations on twitter
@mbeisen @razibkhan Nope, nothing I said on Twitter changed context/content. It’s just a misreading.
-
-
@RebeccaSkloot@razibkhan I'm still not understanding - you're saying the family had to have consented before genome sequencing /1Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@RebeccaSkloot@razibkhan but then you say you have no opinion about familial consent for sequencing - that's the conflation /2 -
@mbeisen@razibkhan I explained in my comment on ur post. It’s about Lackses & HeLa.They=special case but raise larger issues 2 b discussed -
@RebeccaSkloot@razibkhan but you keep saying this is not about history, it's about today - what's the today issue that requires consent?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.