The basic dilemma of algorithmic governance is in its abstraction. "Sovereignty" implies the power of suspensory intervention—deciding when and how to apply the written law. Leaving government to algorithms, then, poisons sovereignty.
-
Show this thread
-
-
Replying to @adornofthagn
Like most things, in the US and EU it's unintended consequences (almost) all the way down.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @goodtheoryguy @adornofthagn
(The "almost" is a question mark over what EU people are doing with automating security at the European level, which is opaque to me but could definitely *admit* the explanation that they're trying to poison sovereignty.)
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @goodtheoryguy
possible, but I for one suspect that to the extent it's intentional the point might not be the elimination of the decision over the exception, but rather a permanent state of exception. btw what does the exception-criterion spell for the sovereignty of the church?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
A.I. assisted cyborg pope is the way to go obviously
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
