Listen to me! The funding of the DNC and Hillary's campaign was omitted. That's important. What aren't you getting about this? This is from the article YOU linked. Did you bother to read your own link? Asking for a friend.
-
-
W odpowiedzi do to @AlFromBayShore@michaelianblack i jeszcze
It said it was politically funded. What part of that confuses you? You assume a judge isn’t smart enough to know what that means. Still, you managed to deflect the argument away from the question I keep asking. What did Strzok lie about?
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do to @WilmingtonDiver@michaelianblack i jeszcze
The term "politically funded" is infinitely different from funded by "the oppositional candidate and the party which she represents". What are you missing about this? The case of the latter implies an interest that is much greater than that of the latter. C'mon man, do better.
4 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do to @AlFromBayShore@michaelianblack i jeszcze
Do you realize that most negative information comes from biased sources? Otherwise they wouldn’t snitch.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do to @WilmingtonDiver@michaelianblack i jeszcze
Once again, Hillary and her people dropped dollars for Chris Steele's report but that was never mentioned. That's an important omission of fact. As KRS One would posit, "Why is that?" The folks who were seeking that FISA warrant were running MAAAAAD game, and they knew it.
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do to @AlFromBayShore@michaelianblack i jeszcze
You think you are right, but a judge hasn’t yet ruled that the warrant is illegal. Until then, the warrant is legal and valid.
4 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do to @WilmingtonDiver@AlFromBayShore i jeszcze
By this logic, if I kill someone, it’s legal until I’m convicted.
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do to @RealSteveCox@AlFromBayShore i jeszcze
The concept of innocent until proven guilty. There are legal reasons to kill someone.
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do to @WilmingtonDiver@AlFromBayShore i jeszcze
No, if you murder someone, it’s against the law whether you’re ever charged or not.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do to @RealSteveCox@AlFromBayShore i jeszcze
Unless it was legal, such as self defense. The point being that a warrant is considered legal and valid until a ruling says otherwise.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych
Self defense isn’t murder. Try again.
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.