Steve CoxKonto zweryfikowane

This was oppo research from the two main entities that had an interest in winning the 2016 election. Omitting that info is HUGE! By the way, that FISA judge appears kinda shady.... and he was close enough to Strzok to have invited him to a party (See the text messages).

Still, it was disclosed the research was opposition related. If the judge felt he needed further clarification, he/she would have asked.

Listen to me! The funding of the DNC and Hillary's campaign was omitted. That's important. What aren't you getting about this? This is from the article YOU linked. Did you bother to read your own link? Asking for a friend.

It said it was politically funded. What part of that confuses you? You assume a judge isn’t smart enough to know what that means. Still, you managed to deflect the argument away from the question I keep asking. What did Strzok lie about?

The term "politically funded" is infinitely different from funded by "the oppositional candidate and the party which she represents". What are you missing about this? The case of the latter implies an interest that is much greater than that of the latter. C'mon man, do better.

Do you realize that most negative information comes from biased sources? Otherwise they wouldn’t snitch.

Once again, Hillary and her people dropped dollars for Chris Steele's report but that was never mentioned. That's an important omission of fact. As KRS One would posit, "Why is that?" The folks who were seeking that FISA warrant were running MAAAAAD game, and they knew it.

You think you are right, but a judge hasn’t yet ruled that the warrant is illegal. Until then, the warrant is legal and valid.