Huh? “Interpreting” isn’t “reading between the lines”. “Interpreting” means you have data that you analyze to determine what it means. In science you *at least* explicitly state the points to draw from. “Reading between the lines” doesn’t.
-
-
Thanks for explaining what every science major inevitably learns. But you evidently think I failed to learn that. Or forgot. In any case your mansplaining no doubt just saved the universe from imploding.
-
“Mansplaining”...
You clearly said I had to “read between the lines” in regard to the article mentioning background checks, for which there was no data to extrapolate.
But if you’re going to try to “win” by using my gender against me, go ahead. I’m out. - Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
-
-
There *is* nevertheless such a thing as reading between the lines. In my chemistry and physics classes we called it “extrapolating from data.” You were so honest and reasonable yesterday. Please don’t stop today. You *know* what I said is valid.
Dziękujemy. Twitter skorzysta z tych informacji, aby Twoja oś czasu bardziej Ci odpowiadała. CofnijCofnij
-
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.
