It’s not a bias against me that I was referring to. It’s a bias against the implications of *some* mental illnesses being more likely to result in violence against other people.
-
Ten tweet jest niedostępny.
I’m providing direct evidence. And frankly, this idea that it’s not a sign of any kind of mental illness for someone to go into a public place and murder people mostly at random, is so potentially damaging that it blows my mind you don’t see the implications of it.
-
-
There are over 100 million gun owners with over 350 million unregistered guns in this country. If mass shootings were not a sign of mental illness, we’d *all* be shot by now.
-
Tens of thousands of us are each year. Mostly women by violent domestic partners. So common it rarely makes national news. But, by the same logic, we’d have all been shot by folks with MI now, too, since that number is 1 in 5.
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
-
-
If this your unwavering opinion—and it appears it is— then I truly hope you support every single opportunity to reach mental health parity and augment mental health and stigma research, so we can better serve the 1 in 5 Americans this impacts every year. I’m not being sarcastic.
-
It’s a top priority. Universal healthcare, rebuilding our mental-health infrastructure that Reagan entirely defunded in the early 1980s, reducing socioeconomic inequality generally, fixing/rebuilding our nation’s infrastructure (such as lead in water), etc.
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.