So... We did not strike chemical-weapons facilities in Syria because 5 months ago they were inspected and no trace of chemical weapons was found.https://twitter.com/shoebridgec/status/985550979709001728 …
-
Or could they have stored the chemical weapons that they withheld from the 2013 Chemical Weapons Convention in another area/facility, to give the idea they had no chemical weapons in sight?
Obama thought not. And truly there’s very little reason to believe even the event in 2013 was genuine...pic.twitter.com/MVceJx9lX8
-
-
I honestly see your point (as I’m not going to throw a tantrum and call you names if we disagree), but take a look at the picture. We know the U.N. doesn’t like the US, so the fact they rejected Russia’s condemnation and, in turn, supported the strikes tells us something.pic.twitter.com/A80B6lnF5H
-
I can send you the link to this article, but it truly tries to make sense of the chemical attack and our response to it. Again, I’m not anxious to get involved in Syria (I was one who retweeted your prediction of the attack), but I don’t know if anything else will stop attacks.pic.twitter.com/DOohBTKNRm
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.