I agree and it's important that we can talk about this. I completely and totally disagree with discussing violence on either side. But for me it is not having a realistic discussion when your first step is to impede my rights.
-
-
W odpowiedzi do to @SIXXCROWS@michaelianblack i jeszcze
But they're man-made rights, and there is already a mechanism to edit the text in which they're found. It's not set in stone.
5 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do to @ABC7Jory@michaelianblack i jeszcze
Absolutely none of my rights are man-made. All my rights are given to me by God my Creator and cannot be taken by anyone
1 odpowiedź 1 podany dalej 14 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do to @SIXXCROWS@michaelianblack i jeszcze
What about people who don't believe in god? What about other countries that ban guns? Does god not exist there?
7 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony -
W odpowiedzi do to @ABC7Jory@SIXXCROWS i jeszcze
Call them “natural rights” as our Founders and enlightenment philosophers did. The point is, the rights in the Bill of Rights are not bequeathed by the government. If they were, they wouldn’t be “rights.” The Bill of Rights is meant to protect rights *all* people have at birth.
3 odpowiedzi 2 podane dalej 7 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do to @RealSteveCox@ABC7Jory i jeszcze
And for the record, I believe Michael means well because I believe he’s a good person. Same with Johnny, except I actually know the guy, so my belief is a bit stronger. I’d really appreciate it if we could stop polarizing this conversation.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 2 polubione -
W odpowiedzi do to @RealSteveCox@ABC7Jory i jeszcze
*Everyone* has compassion for these kids, and they should *never* be put in a situation like they have been. We’re failing as a society to protect them, and it’s largely *because of* this polarization.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 2 polubione -
W odpowiedzi do to @RealSteveCox@ABC7Jory i jeszcze
People who are comfortable with guns simply react differently to these sorts of events than people who are not comfortable with guns. And that’s not going to change. But we *can* decide as a society to presume the “other side” is not stupid or evil. Because they’re not.
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 2 polubione -
W odpowiedzi do to @RealSteveCox@ABC7Jory i jeszcze
In the end, we all want the same things - to stop these mass shootings - so once we start at where we agree, we should be able to agree on cogent solutions. But if the goal isn’t “stop mass shootings” and is instead “get rid of guns” we will *never* come to agreement.

1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony -
W odpowiedzi do to @RealSteveCox@SIXXCROWS i jeszcze
What would be the point of getting rid of guns other than stopping shootings, mass or otherwise?
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych
You can’t rid society of anything for which there is a market. If you could, we wouldn’t have cocaine, prostitution, gambling... If there’s a market, it will always be served by somebody. You can kill the gun market, but only through making people not want guns in the 1st place.
-
-
Ten tweet jest niedostępny.
-
W odpowiedzi do to @SmolBunxx@ABC7Jory i jeszcze
It could. But we’re certainly a long, long way away from such a thing.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych
Koniec rozmowy
-
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.