I believe the way to solve gun violence is a sober constructive and intellectual debate and discussion in which case both sides with respect to the individual views come to a mutual and logical agreement not based off of emotions.
-
Ten tweet jest niedostępny.
-
Ten tweet jest niedostępny.
-
Ten tweet jest niedostępny.
-
Call them “natural rights” as our Founders and enlightenment philosophers did. The point is, the rights in the Bill of Rights are not bequeathed by the government. If they were, they wouldn’t be “rights.” The Bill of Rights is meant to protect rights *all* people have at birth.
And for the record, I believe Michael means well because I believe he’s a good person. Same with Johnny, except I actually know the guy, so my belief is a bit stronger. I’d really appreciate it if we could stop polarizing this conversation.
-
-
*Everyone* has compassion for these kids, and they should *never* be put in a situation like they have been. We’re failing as a society to protect them, and it’s largely *because of* this polarization.
-
People who are comfortable with guns simply react differently to these sorts of events than people who are not comfortable with guns. And that’s not going to change. But we *can* decide as a society to presume the “other side” is not stupid or evil. Because they’re not.
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.