The ‘If you make laws, criminals will just break them, so what’s the point?’ argument, is one of the most embarrassing. I can’t believe people say that out loud, or write it where it can be seen. Hoo boy.
-
“Studies show removing the implement used to commit suicide doesn’t reduce that rate.“ Show me a study. A link. I’ve read suicide studies recently. Def not what they said. But I’ll check out your link.
This isn't the study I had read previously, but it's on the point anyway: Australia's suicide rate has dropped largely because they implemented many changes, but they found the suicide rate by hanging increased anyway, while it dropped using firearms.https://www.mja.com.au/journal/2010/192/8/suicide-australia-meta-analysis-rates-and-methods-suicide-between-1988-and-2007 …
-
-
Dude. You just linked to a study proving an overall decline in suicides, correlated with a huge reduction in gun suicides. It shows that once people didn’t have a gun to use on an impulse, many people lived. What exactly are you fighting for here? Easier suicide?pic.twitter.com/1sLQyPagrz
-
Nice cherrypicking. It says “coincides”. If you don’t know what that word means, look it up. And read all the *other* things they did at that time that had nothing to do with suicide methods.
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.