Steve CoxKonto zweryfikowane

Read the story. He inducted 13 supposed members of a private company, none of whom are even in the US. It’s a political indictment. Posturing. And even if it’s *all* true, they didn’t move any numbers. Hillary spent over a billion dollars - 3x as much as Trump - and lost.

Right. "None of the indictments so far have involved Russian election interference." "Oh, they have? Well, those indictments were just POLITICAL indictments". WTF does that even mean? You are dismissing every fact that doesn't align with your preferred narrative.

I was talking about the people close to Trump like Manafort. They can indict unknown people in a foreign land all day long. It’s meaningless. Do you believe “WMDs in Iraq” was a mistake? Or a lie?

Manafort is being squeezed on his other dealings to get him to talk about Russia. He was at the Don Jr mtg, too. And he was instrumental in having the GOP platform 180 on Ukraine. We will likely learn more. You are making conclusion about an investigation that is far from over.

The Don Jr meeting, for which our own DOJ helped a Russian lawyer enter the country when she couldn’t get a visa, knowing she was to meet with Jr? That one? Which, BTW, also resulted in absolutely zero info for the Trump campaign to use? https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/did-the-obama-doj-let-russian-lawyer-natalia-veselnitskaya-into-the-u-s/ …

You have no idea what came out of that mtg. You are taking the word of Don Jr and the agents he met with. Again, you're drawing conclusions well in advance of all the info to come out.

The two people confirmed in the meeting - Trump Jr and the lawyer - both say there was in intel given over. Why would the Obama DOJ let a Russian spy into the country to meet with the Trump campaign if they thought she’d have good info to use against Clinton?

Like I said, you are simply taking the word of the alleged conspirators at face value. People who already lied once about the nature of the meeting.