I mean, our intel community and military complex have a solid history of honesty, right? “WMDs”, “The Gulf of Tonkin Incident”, overthrowing about 4 dozen governments the last 70 years...
-
Ten tweet jest niedostępny.
-
So, do you think all of these indictments are a sham? Do you dismiss the IC assessment of Russian election interference on Trump's behalf? Was Don Jr's mtg w/Russian agents really about adoptions? Is Trump's refusal to enforce sanctions just a policy judgment?
We have seen absolutely ZERO independently verifiable evidence of Russian interference for Trump. Zero. And none of the indictments so far have involved Russian election interference, either. Once you realize that, the rest comes into focus.
-
-
LOL, dude it's right there in the headline. https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/16/politics/mueller-russia-indictments-election-interference/index.html …
-
Read the story. He inducted 13 supposed members of a private company, none of whom are even in the US. It’s a political indictment. Posturing. And even if it’s *all* true, they didn’t move any numbers. Hillary spent over a billion dollars - 3x as much as Trump - and lost.
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.