You sound like someone who is using themselves as a template meaning you think the majority must be ruled over because it's what you would do. If you don't have faith that the majority aren't sociopaths or psychopaths I think you're proving my point.
-
-
W odpowiedzi do @EngineerEarth
Dude, the quote is from Ben Franklin.pic.twitter.com/P7KjoLJlam
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @RealSteveCox
I'll have to take your lack of response as a vivid example of how you perceive the majority & why you feel the minority must be protected from perceived ignorant choices. I can only assume you feel is you. I grew up around people who feel this is how it should be. I cannot agree
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @EngineerEarth
You disagree with the people who intentionally framed this government as a republic rather than a democracy. So, ok. Feel free. But remember you’re only free because your rights are protected. And your rights are protected because this is a republic, not a democracy.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
Ten tweet jest niedostępny.
-
W odpowiedzi do @dan85895877 @EngineerEarth
*Actual* Jefferson:pic.twitter.com/psjlZ8aTuU
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @RealSteveCox @dan85895877
What Jefferson is saying is that the law must be applied evenly which it isn't nor are we a country with a real Constitution as both parties "suspended" it many years ago hence NDAA & the like=this is an oligarchy POSING as a representative democracy. http://pandaunite.org/top-myths-about-the-ndaa/ …
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @EngineerEarth @dan85895877
That’s not what he’s saying. He’s saying the minority have the same rights as the majority and thus cannot have their rights violated by said majority. It’s plain English.
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @RealSteveCox @dan85895877
Isn't that what I said=that the law must be applied evenly meaning Rights which shall not be infringed upon? Which isn't what we have that much should be obvious there is only a faint guise that the two parties are operating Constitutionally.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
I could go down a massive list of unconstitutional behavior, selective application of law which is systematic meaning no matter if it's Democrat or Republican they cover for one another you saw that vividly with Obama covering for Bush/Cheney it's two parties one real agenda.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych
You’re reading way too much into this. It’s simply a comparison between direct democracy and a constitutional republic. That’s it.
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.