No. If two people want to voluntarily trade, no third party has the right to regulate or stop such interaction.https://twitter.com/prageru/status/969634647037620227 …
-
Now were back to- individual morality and group morality should always be performed on a voluntary basis, without coercive interference on the part of ANY third party- including the state.
This isn’t a moral issue, it’s a legal one. Regardless, does your set of rules apply to, for example, hospitals? If you are diagnosed with cancer, and a hospital knows you’re a captive market and as such says “It’ll be $500k, or else you’ll die” is that coercion ok?
-
-
That is exactly why market competition is vital. Yes you have the right to charge whatever for a service, just as you and I provide NO SERVICE at all, which is worse than providing it for 500k. What if Joe never ever has sex, Can he force Mary to love him. Voluntarism > Force
-
Market competition doesn’t work unless there’s also the option to say “no thank you.” That’s what a “free market” is. We, the people, are “the market.” A free market, first & foremost, is a market that can enter & leave the marketplace at will. “Pay or die” is a captive market.
Koniec rozmowy
Nowa rozmowa -
-
-
Do I have the right to enslave someone to make me food/clothing/or medical treatment? No, because initiating violence is always wrong, for everyone.pic.twitter.com/tH2Uz0Dw7l
-
Doctors can choose not to be doctors.
Koniec rozmowy
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.