Compromise? So, to you, just to be clear, allowing 3000 Americans - a significant percentage of whom are children - to die every month due to lack of health insurance is a necessary compromise? I reject that. With heavy prejudice.
-
Again, if being principled is letting the house burn down or progress get pushed back because you don't think it went far enough your "principles" are ego and don't help. They're regressive and bad strategy. And they're not about what you say u want
One step back, two steps forward. It’s fine. What won’t work is continuing to vote for the Democrats and hoping that, as a result, they’ll change. People/parties don’t change if they’re winning. Your vote is an *endorsement* of the status quo.
-
-
If you want change, you have to let them keep losing until they refuse *all* corporate/Super PAC/dark money contributions. Because healthcare won’t be fixed until the healthcare industry doesn’t own the legislators. Thus my candidacy.
-
Doesn't matter how much damage is done and progress lost (let alone not gained) so long as they learn some lesson. That's not principle, that's arrogance and self indulgence
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.