Basically, our poor have consistently had options taken away from them, until they're left with "join a gang/sell drugs/guns, or starve" and then you end up with a lot of violence. Add to that lack of social support for families, lack of paid time off, etc....
-
-
W odpowiedzi do to @RealSteveCox@MaerzLab i jeszcze
And the fact that the middle class is getting squeezed harder and harder, and pressure mounts, and it results in family violence as well. Our socioeconomics are terrible compared to Europe and all of the countries Bloomberg's "Everytown" likes to compare us to.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony -
W odpowiedzi do to @RealSteveCox@MaerzLab i jeszcze
To put gun ownership in perspective: There are 33,000 gun deaths per year here (approx), and about 2/3 are suicides and 1/3 homicides. ALL of them are tragic. All of them. But think about this: 100 million gun owners here. 1% of that is 1 million.....
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do to @RealSteveCox@MaerzLab i jeszcze
If you assume that every gun owner who kills somebody only kills one person (either themselves or somebody else), divide 33,000 deaths per year into 1 million gun owners. You get 30 years and 4 months. That's how long it would take to get to 1% of gun owners at the present rate.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do to @RealSteveCox@MaerzLab i jeszcze
So, sincerely, I know it seems counter-intuitive to people who don't know the data, and don't consider social and economic factors, but truly, it's not the guns *causing* gun crime. They're a symptom, not a cause. Now, I'll get to the 1993 bit...
4 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do to @RealSteveCox@Clutter2 i jeszcze
Steve - Your response is compelling and I believe in the connections between poverty and violence. The four poorest states in the US have the highest violence rates, and the 8 poorest states in US are among the 10 states with the highest gun death rates (suicide + violence).
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony -
I just wish people would hear me out instead of freaking out, calling me a Republican, accusing me of taking money from the NRA, and then blocking me. But I can only control me. *sigh*
3 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do to @RealSteveCox@Clutter2 i jeszcze
They don't treat them as a right. They are a privilege. They also recognize that, like drugs, the risks they pose require, even if by a few, are too costly to society. Regulation is needed, and among the law-abiding, it is reasonable to accept that regulation.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
Do you really think drugs are a risk to society?
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do to @RealSteveCox@Clutter2 i jeszcze
I would like addiction managed as a health issue, and believe that more equitable economies would keep more people out of the drug economy. But when I look at the opioid crisis [that is what hit my family], I know regulation is needed on some types of drugs.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony
Opioid addiction starts at pharmaceutical companies, then leads to heroin. Heroin kills because people are used to doing X amount then get more-pure stuff and OD. Gov regulation would prevent that, and taxation could treat addicts. My .02
-
-
W odpowiedzi do to @RealSteveCox@Clutter2 i jeszcze
Spot on.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
Here’s some interesting reading. Notice how much emphasis on mental health. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2018/02/15/europe-had-school-shootings-too-then-they-did-something-about-it/ …
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych - Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.