Here, in the US, in this regard, I already touched on our poverty level (20%, with threshold set much lower than in those countries), but add in the war on drugs and resulting social imbalance, lack of universal healthcare, and Reagan defunding our mental-health infrastructure...
-
-
W odpowiedzi do to @RealSteveCox@MaerzLab i jeszcze
And then you can look at the inequality of school funding for inner cities (because it's often based on local property taxes), which is meant to be offset by federal spending, which *both* parties have been cutting and diverting to charter schools...
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 2 polubione -
W odpowiedzi do to @RealSteveCox@MaerzLab i jeszcze
Basically, our poor have consistently had options taken away from them, until they're left with "join a gang/sell drugs/guns, or starve" and then you end up with a lot of violence. Add to that lack of social support for families, lack of paid time off, etc....
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony -
W odpowiedzi do to @RealSteveCox@MaerzLab i jeszcze
And the fact that the middle class is getting squeezed harder and harder, and pressure mounts, and it results in family violence as well. Our socioeconomics are terrible compared to Europe and all of the countries Bloomberg's "Everytown" likes to compare us to.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony -
W odpowiedzi do to @RealSteveCox@MaerzLab i jeszcze
To put gun ownership in perspective: There are 33,000 gun deaths per year here (approx), and about 2/3 are suicides and 1/3 homicides. ALL of them are tragic. All of them. But think about this: 100 million gun owners here. 1% of that is 1 million.....
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do to @RealSteveCox@MaerzLab i jeszcze
If you assume that every gun owner who kills somebody only kills one person (either themselves or somebody else), divide 33,000 deaths per year into 1 million gun owners. You get 30 years and 4 months. That's how long it would take to get to 1% of gun owners at the present rate.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do to @RealSteveCox@MaerzLab i jeszcze
So, sincerely, I know it seems counter-intuitive to people who don't know the data, and don't consider social and economic factors, but truly, it's not the guns *causing* gun crime. They're a symptom, not a cause. Now, I'll get to the 1993 bit...
4 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do to @RealSteveCox@Clutter2 i jeszcze
Steve - Your response is compelling and I believe in the connections between poverty and violence. The four poorest states in the US have the highest violence rates, and the 8 poorest states in US are among the 10 states with the highest gun death rates (suicide + violence).
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony -
I just wish people would hear me out instead of freaking out, calling me a Republican, accusing me of taking money from the NRA, and then blocking me. But I can only control me. *sigh*
3 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do to @RealSteveCox@Clutter2 i jeszcze
You're no Republican. And I am with you 100% on addressing poverty and inequality, and believe it would contribute to alleviating violence and gun deaths. But I don't believe it will be a sufficient remedy without our nation addressing our access to guns.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych
Ok. That’s where we disagree. And I still think the “access to guns” ship has sailed. Nice conversation at the end here, though. Thank you.
-
-
W odpowiedzi do to @RealSteveCox@Clutter2 i jeszcze
Good luck with your candidacy.
0 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionychDziękujemy. Twitter skorzysta z tych informacji, aby Twoja oś czasu bardziej Ci odpowiadała. CofnijCofnij
-
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.