Simply put, they don't have gun homicides like we do because they have much better socioeconomic equality than we do. The poor aren't too poor, and the rich aren't too rich.
I just wish people would hear me out instead of freaking out, calling me a Republican, accusing me of taking money from the NRA, and then blocking me. But I can only control me. *sigh*
-
-
You're no Republican. And I am with you 100% on addressing poverty and inequality, and believe it would contribute to alleviating violence and gun deaths. But I don't believe it will be a sufficient remedy without our nation addressing our access to guns.
-
Ok. That’s where we disagree. And I still think the “access to guns” ship has sailed. Nice conversation at the end here, though. Thank you.
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
-
-
I have been fortunate to travel in many other countries, many that have nearly identical cultures to ours. They have many of the same problems, though generally not the inequality that we do. They have a fundamentally different relationship with guns.
-
I have, too. But remember the stats for 1% of gun owners? Most gun owners aren’t a problem unless you attack them. Yeah, Americans like their guns. But just because it’s uncomfortable to people who don’t like guns doesn’t make them problematic.
Koniec rozmowy
Nowa rozmowa -
-
-
They don't treat them as a right. They are a privilege. They also recognize that, like drugs, the risks they pose require, even if by a few, are too costly to society. Regulation is needed, and among the law-abiding, it is reasonable to accept that regulation.
-
Do you really think drugs are a risk to society?
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.