Simply put, they don't have gun homicides like we do because they have much better socioeconomic equality than we do. The poor aren't too poor, and the rich aren't too rich.
This is going to seem like a non-sequitur, but I don't think it is. There are many factors that led to the decline in gun homicides after its peak in 1993. But one thing to consider is this: It peaked around that time *everywhere*. Not just in the US.
-
-
More specifically, violent crime (murder especially, regardless of implement used) peaked almost everywhere in the world between 1991 and 1996, then began declining. This excludes places where wars have started, or other major calamities.
-
Because of that, it's pretty easy to rule out "gun laws" such as the Brady Bill as a source of our decline in gun homicides. There was only a Brady Bill here, obviously. But we can go farther than just "it wasn't gun control laws."
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.