So, do you want the actual answers to those questions? Because I have them.
-
-
W odpowiedzi do to @RealSteveCox@MaerzLab i jeszcze
Just let me know when you want the answers.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do to @RealSteveCox@Clutter2 i jeszcze
Anytime you want to offer your answers, I am listening.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
Ok. This will take a few posts. I’ll let you know when I’m done. First, France/England: They’re very similar countries whose histories are intertwined. Consider, for example, that Brits don’t flip people off, but rather hold up two fingers...
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do to @RealSteveCox@MaerzLab i jeszcze
When the French would capture a British archer, they’d cut off his index and middle fingers then send him home. He couldn’t fire arrows anymore. They hold up two fingers to show they’re still a threat. Nothing to do with this. Just an interesting story.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony -
W odpowiedzi do to @RealSteveCox@MaerzLab i jeszcze
England and France both have about the same level of poverty (approx 14%). The poverty line is set at 60% of the median income in both countries. Here, for example, it’s set at about 40%. So their poor are less poor, and there are less *of* them.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do to @RealSteveCox@MaerzLab i jeszcze
Both countries have universal healthcare. Both countries have strong welfare programs to help those who are underprivileged. Both countries lack things like heavy drug sentencing for possession. They both have a much smaller wealth/wage gap than we do, too. (It's getting worse.)
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do to @RealSteveCox@MaerzLab i jeszcze
Simply put, they don't have gun homicides like we do because they have much better socioeconomic equality than we do. The poor aren't too poor, and the rich aren't too rich.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do to @RealSteveCox@MaerzLab i jeszcze
As things continue to divide there in terms of wealth inequality, my bet is gun crime/homicide rises regardless of gun-ownership levels. It may have already started. I haven't looked. My numbers are from The Guardian in 2012. But that's the answer to that one. Socioeconomics.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do to @RealSteveCox@MaerzLab i jeszcze
Here, in the US, in this regard, I already touched on our poverty level (20%, with threshold set much lower than in those countries), but add in the war on drugs and resulting social imbalance, lack of universal healthcare, and Reagan defunding our mental-health infrastructure...
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 2 polubione
And then you can look at the inequality of school funding for inner cities (because it's often based on local property taxes), which is meant to be offset by federal spending, which *both* parties have been cutting and diverting to charter schools...
-
-
W odpowiedzi do to @RealSteveCox@MaerzLab i jeszcze
Basically, our poor have consistently had options taken away from them, until they're left with "join a gang/sell drugs/guns, or starve" and then you end up with a lot of violence. Add to that lack of social support for families, lack of paid time off, etc....
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony -
W odpowiedzi do to @RealSteveCox@MaerzLab i jeszcze
And the fact that the middle class is getting squeezed harder and harder, and pressure mounts, and it results in family violence as well. Our socioeconomics are terrible compared to Europe and all of the countries Bloomberg's "Everytown" likes to compare us to.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony - Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.