Sure. But you would need the patience to understand statistics and data, something I am amply experienced with. The simple mind seeks refuge in anecdotes. Reason requires looking at patterns on the whole & making informed judgments, even in the face of uncertainty & complexity.
-
-
I’m a data guy, too. I’ll take that as a no on both counts.
6 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do to @RealSteveCox@Clutter2 i jeszcze
It is a reasonable question to ask why the residual differences among samples. Is there a reason some gun death rates are higher of lower for similar rates of gun ownership. Is it chance or are there other factors that we could identify that would lead to solutions.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
You’re still not answering my questions. Do I have to ask again?
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do to @RealSteveCox@Clutter2 i jeszcze
You offer nothing but anecdotes but expect answers in 1 minute. You offer evidence, not anecdotes, but evidence of all the claims you have put forward in this thread. I'll work not on the homicide one. Get back to you.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
1993 to current, down by half here. (There’s more to this. We’ll see if you figure it out.) Gun ownership has skyrocketed in that time. So, how has it dropped by half? France to England, same gun-homicide rate, but France has 5x the rate of gun ownership. Why?
10 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do to @RealSteveCox@Clutter2 i jeszcze
I offer this graph cautiously. In the time I had, I could not verify the source data. The data is reported to be from European countries in 2000 and the US in 2001, so it is more dated than the studies I referenced previously. Clearly lots of variation, but a pattern nonetheless.pic.twitter.com/Xq610vwKal
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
There isn’t truly reliable data on households with firearms. Gun owners tend to lie when surveyed out of paranoia that their guns will be taken.
6 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do to @RealSteveCox@Clutter2 i jeszcze
I found additional data from an alternate source. It shows the same pattern. You can doubt that there is a decline in number of households that own guns. But your assertion is that the trend is the opposite direction. People are lying at a higher rate.pic.twitter.com/NTo7kDNG7S
3 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do to @MaerzLab@RealSteveCox i jeszcze
Now, a data guy would easily recognize there is no way the % of household w/guns went from 43% in 2012, to 37% in 2013, back to 42% in 2014. It's sampling error. Which is why anecdotal comparisons between 2 or 3 points are not evidence. Larger patterns are.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych
Sampling errors are based on the idea people are answering honestly.
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.