I’m sorry, but the numbers are the numbers, & they indicate that gun laws will *not* prevent these things from happening. But there *are* things we *can* do to prevent school shootings, & other mass shootings. Universal (inc. mental) healthcare is a great start. 9/
-
Pokaż ten wątek
-
And I believe we can take a page out of what’s working in commercial flight, where Air Marshals fly while armed, and allow faculty to choose to go through the same background checks and training as Air Marshals, adjusted for schools, then carry concealed. School Marshals. 10/
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionychPokaż ten wątek -
Because these children are *entitled* to protection from these sick people. And frankly, I believe that many school shootings will be prevented outright just by allowing School Marshals to become reality, even if there aren’t any on most campuses. 11/
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 1 polubionyPokaż ten wątek -
Because, as with Air Marshals, nobody would know who is or is not carrying a weapon except for the essential “crew”, and in the case of schools, that would be the Principles and Vice Principles. This is the only way I’ve been able to think of that gives these kids a chance. 12/
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 1 polubionyPokaż ten wątek -
And the thing is, Democrats who push this “gun legislation” narrative *must* know these numbers, and if they don’t, they should not be in the business of pushing legislation. If they know these numbers, they know gun laws won’t stop these tragedies. 13/
3 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionychPokaż ten wątek -
W odpowiedzi do @RealSteveCox
I suggest that in order to make progress we ISOLATE each topic involved (I.e. Mental Health, AR15's, Gun Laws, Illegal Possession) and LEAVE THE WORDS "DEMOCRAT" and "REPUBLICAN" *OUT*
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @IngerWoman
I disagree. We need to recognize that the parties are both making money off the backs of dead kids. Because it’s true.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @RealSteveCox
I'm not saying they're not. (And that subject is a worthy one to ISOLATE as well!). I just mean the dialogue tends to go NOWHERE because everyone who belongs to A PARTY will DEFEND their party, and the stagnancy will continue.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony -
W odpowiedzi do @IngerWoman
My experience running for Congress is that people just hate their own parties less than the other one. As long as I make sure to show them that I don’t favor one or the other (and I do *not*) people will listen.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @RealSteveCox
Agreed! Which is why I suggest using the two words minimally so as not to alienate. Thank you for the thoughtful replies! I appreciate them.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony
We all need to talk to each other. All this polarization and hatred is destroying our society. Thank you for your input.
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.