Which means the government has very little real idea where these firearms are even located. I’m running for Congress to actually start us down the path of fixing what ails our nation. I don’t want to make people *feel* better, but actually make people better. 4/
-
Pokaż ten wątek
-
A huge part of this requires that we realize that laws are not magical. Another huge part is about concentrating on legislation that will actually help people - as many people as possible, as significantly as possible. Example: Universal healthcare must be a top priority. 5/
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionychPokaż ten wątek -
If we don’t know where these 320 million firearms are, even if we collectively decided as a society to round *all* of them up and destroy them, actually *doing* that is *impossible*. We should ban bump-stocks, but also understand they’re already out there, and will be. 6/
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 1 polubionyPokaż ten wątek -
We should have universal background checks, but in a society without universal healthcare, it’s unlikely we’ll stop many people with mental-health issues from buying guns *legally* because you need a *diagnosis* which costs a lot of money. 7/
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionychPokaż ten wątek -
And with this many unregistered guns out there, the bigger problem becomes our inability to stop sick people from obtaining these weapons through *illegal* means. We have 98,000 public schools. Doing the math, that’s a minimum of 3,265 *unregistered* guns *per school*. 8/
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionychPokaż ten wątek -
I’m sorry, but the numbers are the numbers, & they indicate that gun laws will *not* prevent these things from happening. But there *are* things we *can* do to prevent school shootings, & other mass shootings. Universal (inc. mental) healthcare is a great start. 9/
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 2 polubionePokaż ten wątek -
And I believe we can take a page out of what’s working in commercial flight, where Air Marshals fly while armed, and allow faculty to choose to go through the same background checks and training as Air Marshals, adjusted for schools, then carry concealed. School Marshals. 10/
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionychPokaż ten wątek -
Because these children are *entitled* to protection from these sick people. And frankly, I believe that many school shootings will be prevented outright just by allowing School Marshals to become reality, even if there aren’t any on most campuses. 11/
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 1 polubionyPokaż ten wątek -
Because, as with Air Marshals, nobody would know who is or is not carrying a weapon except for the essential “crew”, and in the case of schools, that would be the Principles and Vice Principles. This is the only way I’ve been able to think of that gives these kids a chance. 12/
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 1 polubionyPokaż ten wątek -
W odpowiedzi do @RealSteveCox
While not a bad idea to allow qualified school officials to get trained and be armed, you cannot equate w/law-enforcement like Air Marshalls whose ONLY FOCUS is recognizing & training for violent scenarios, & often have had careers in law enforcement
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych
People are people. Training is training. Law enforcement isn’t some “special breed” of human. And at Sandy Hook, the first officers on scene waited outside for five minutes while Lanza was killing kids. Staff at the school wouldn’t do that.
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.