The funny thing is that Progressives understand the fight for increase in rights. They live for it. So why is a gun owners rights different? Can they at least start to understand the intensity of the desire to protect their rights. Can we start the dialogue there?
-
-
That's true in every case. So what's your point, then?
-
That’s *not* true in every case. People with guns could’ve killed Lanza, for example. The Nevada shooting was rare because there was no tactical way to directly confront the shooter. Usually, there is.
Koniec rozmowy
Nowa rozmowa -
-
-
Your original post in this thread: "... “How was there nobody there to shoot the shooter?!” We call cops because they have guns. Cops waited over 5 min to enter the school while shooting was happening." You imply a good guy w a gun could have done something once it started!
-
Because they could’ve. But there weren’t any available.
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.