The funny thing is that Progressives understand the fight for increase in rights. They live for it. So why is a gun owners rights different? Can they at least start to understand the intensity of the desire to protect their rights. Can we start the dialogue there?
-
I believe that it is a very human trait to use fear to win arguments. This is why looking at our unconscious biases is so important. I think also that some Dems really see too many guns as THE problem too, no? It feels logical - more guns, more violence.
Seems logical except the numbers don’t correlate, and then the Bloomberg anti-gun lobby cherry-picks “peer countries” to intentionally mislead on that point. I’m a data person. Anybody proposing legislation should be good at analyzing data. Plus, guns are inanimate objects.
-
-
So are cigarettes. Curious, does the data support less access to cigarettes due to high taxes, age limitations WITH education about harmful effects having lowered the death rates due to smoking?
-
Education is how you effectively ban *anything*. Prohibition of any good or service for which there’s a market always results in more violence rather than less. The key is to kill the market, and you can only do that with education. Make people not *want* whatever it is.pic.twitter.com/qkVkXTWzx8
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.