Steve CoxKonto zweryfikowane

It doesn't matter who appointed them. They're in a system. The system's the problem, not the faces. Show us independently verifiable evidence that Russia interfered in the election. Something that doesn't rely on the word of any agency.

So you’re asking for someone to gather intelligence, but not the agencies that specialize in gathering intelligence? Should we hire like a marketing agency?

I'm asking for evidence to be presented to us rather than just having them tell us they have the evidence. And they'd do it if they had it.

That may be true. Doesn’t mean the underlying thing didn’t happen. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/jan/19/twitter-admits-far-more-russian-bots-posted-on-election-than-it-had-disclosed …

Twitter bots did not swing the election. And it's not what's been alleged since Day One. So, why can't *anybody* provide independently verifiable evidence of Russian election interference?

The disinformation and propaganda campaigns via social absolutely influenced the election. If you’re asking for evidence of physical vote tampering, that’s a different story.

Ok, then show us the verifiable math that Twitter bots swung the election. In doing these calculations, remember to include the Pro-Hillary bots from CTR and similar. I'll wait here.