Who believes what now?
-
That may be true. Doesn’t mean the underlying thing didn’t happen. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/jan/19/twitter-admits-far-more-russian-bots-posted-on-election-than-it-had-disclosed …
Twitter bots did not swing the election. And it's not what's been alleged since Day One. So, why can't *anybody* provide independently verifiable evidence of Russian election interference?
-
-
The disinformation and propaganda campaigns via social absolutely influenced the election. If you’re asking for evidence of physical vote tampering, that’s a different story.
-
Ok, then show us the verifiable math that Twitter bots swung the election. In doing these calculations, remember to include the Pro-Hillary bots from CTR and similar. I'll wait here.
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
-
-
I mean this comes pretty close: https://www.volkskrant.nl/media/dutch-agencies-provide-crucial-intel-about-russia-s-interference-in-us-elections~a4561913/ … Also, the answer is that the investigations are still on going, intel agencies are protecting sources and methods, and the powers that be don’t, as a habit, invite random people to review all their classified documents.
- Koniec rozmowy
Nowa rozmowa -
-
-
Have you not read any of the cyber forensics reports or...
Dziękujemy. Twitter skorzysta z tych informacji, aby Twoja oś czasu bardziej Ci odpowiadała. CofnijCofnij
-
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.