This is the key. It was presented by the FBI to the FISA court under false pretenses that it was part of a legitimate FBI (and allied agencies) investigation, when in reality it was essentially a fictional brief funded by the Democrats. Major problem. But not at all surprising.https://twitter.com/latimes/status/959496556058697728 …
-
the FISA warrant on Page was renewed 3 times, means DOJ presented courts evidences that shows it got information corroborating original warrant. The Steele dossier becomes irrelevant after that
Your conclusion there isn't accurate. And your logic's flawed. By that logic, police can stop you for a broken tail light you didn't actually have, then arrest you for becoming belligerent about it. If the initial point was a lie, it's *all* wrong.
-
-
i would rather say “ police can stop you for a broken tail light you didn’t actually have, them arrest you for the corpse you hid in your trunk. “
-
It would get thrown out in court.
Koniec rozmowy
Nowa rozmowa -
-
-
and now it appears anyway that the CI investigation began before the FISA warrant on Page. Papadopoulos was already under investigation.
-
And why wasn't Podesta Group under investigation, too? Why just Trump associates?
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.