37/ And more than I care to admit, I wonder what's going to happen if Trump wises up and learns to act and sound reasonable. What's going to happen the day he discovers the power of being held to low standards? That is a prospect that terrifies me. That is the day we lose.
-
Pokaż ten wątek
-
38/ Because once Trump is gone, once Democrats are back in control, what is our message? What is our reason to be there? And if we don't have a good answer, some Trump-like person will be back. They have the playbook. If we fail to offer an alternative, someone will step up.
3 odpowiedzi 23 podane dalej 169 polubionychPokaż ten wątek -
39/ And god forbid Trump wises up someday. That will be the Windmill situation. A perpetual check that brings on a paralytic hold of our future.
3 odpowiedzi 11 podanych dalej 142 polubionePokaż ten wątek -
40/ Our leadership has got to start punching back. And hard. No more half-measures. No more soft spoken tactics. No more apologizing. Be bold. Be proud. Be aggressive. That is the only way we win this. /thread
36 odpowiedzi 144 podane dalej 604 polubionePokaż ten wątek -
W odpowiedzi do @cmclymer
The major flaw in your analysis comes by virtue of your loyalty to the party. The reason they aren't bold, & lose, is a conscious choice. They let the Republicans win on 1 thing after another because losing on those things makes their donors richer. Donors both parties share. 1/
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @RealSteveCox @cmclymer
The table is tilted. The game is rigged. They force-feed us bad candidates and policies because they believe we'll have to accept them, since the Republican candidates and policies are worse. Example: Under the ACA, 3000 die every month for lack of insurance. 2/
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @RealSteveCox @cmclymer
Forcing us to choose between 3000 and 5000 (the Republican plan) is evil. The number should be zero. Period. Your mistake is believing they care about you like you apparently care about them. They don't. They care about money and power. That's it. 3/
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @RealSteveCox @cmclymer
Their loyalty is to their big donors and their money. They've abandoned workers, and no longer represent the poor or middle class. And Hillary's loss wasn't enough of a wake-up call because they'd rather alienate their constituents than their donors. 4/
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @RealSteveCox @cmclymer
The only way to fix a party like that is to make sure they keep *losing* until they come to their senses and turn down *all* of their donations (bribes) from industry, PACs, and dark-money groups. They won't change if you vote for them. That's an endorsement. 5/
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @RealSteveCox @cmclymer
So, a lot of people need to decide if the letter D is more important to them than the principles they claim to stand for. Parties over principles is how we got here. Principles over parties is how we get out.
#ThePartiesAreTheProblem http://VoteForCox.com 6/62 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.