There's a strong correlation between "people who demand the abolition of anonymity on social media" and "people whose wealth enables them to never even think about whether a tweet could compromise their economic security"
-
-
W odpowiedzi do @mtracey
I've always used my real name and picture on here, and I'm *not* wealthy. At all. I don't even *have* a savings account. Why would it be so bad for everyone to say who they are?
9 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony -
W odpowiedzi do @RealSteveCox
Because they could be penalized economically for expressing their political beliefs.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 36 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @mtracey
Why don't we prevent that instead?
3 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @RealSteveCox
One way to prevent it is to allow people to express political beliefs online under a pseudonym if they choose.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 44 polubione -
W odpowiedzi do @mtracey
It just strikes me as cowardly. I've *definitely* missed out on opportunities for work by stating my political opinions. I know it for a fact. But I think opinions without a human being behind them tend to be given less credence.pic.twitter.com/5YS1O2udcn
12 odpowiedzi 1 podany dalej 1 polubiony -
W odpowiedzi do @RealSteveCox @mtracey
There's a human being behind every opinion, so your point is moot. Defining someone as cowardly or thinking their opinions matter less for not adhering to your specific set of values is about as pathetic as you can get.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 2 polubione
Cowardly has a definition. It is: lacking courage; contemptibly timid. Posting anonymously online requires no courage, and when done for fear of backlash, is timid.
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.