There's a strong correlation between "people who demand the abolition of anonymity on social media" and "people whose wealth enables them to never even think about whether a tweet could compromise their economic security"
-
-
W odpowiedzi do @mtracey
I've always used my real name and picture on here, and I'm *not* wealthy. At all. I don't even *have* a savings account. Why would it be so bad for everyone to say who they are?
9 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony -
W odpowiedzi do @RealSteveCox
Because they could be penalized economically for expressing their political beliefs.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 36 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @mtracey
Why don't we prevent that instead?
3 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @RealSteveCox
One way to prevent it is to allow people to express political beliefs online under a pseudonym if they choose.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 44 polubione -
W odpowiedzi do @mtracey
It just strikes me as cowardly. I've *definitely* missed out on opportunities for work by stating my political opinions. I know it for a fact. But I think opinions without a human being behind them tend to be given less credence.pic.twitter.com/5YS1O2udcn
12 odpowiedzi 1 podany dalej 1 polubiony -
W odpowiedzi do @RealSteveCox @mtracey
Well I would never characterize James Madison, John Jay, Alexander Hamilton or Patrick Henry as cowardly for publishing essays anonymously on what was to become the Bill of Rights. Their ideas stood above the politics of the day because their was no author.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych
False equivalency.
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.