He’s talking about mass public debate. Not one on one. That’s why his articles are odd. He can change people one on one. Not a mass televised ordeal. That gives them an audience they wouldn’t otherwise have.
-
He’s brought him up before. In our previous conversation. This isn’t just a hypothetical with him.
YOU brought it up here. You believe racists are somehow subhuman and impossible to reason with. I disagree. I believe *all* people (with few exceptions, like sociopaths) are the same. Racists are ignorant, not inhuman. That's the disagreement.