Live interview generic ballot polls in December CNN D+18 Quinnipiac D+15 Monmouth D+15 Marist D+13 POS (R) D+12 NBC/WSJ D+11
-
-
W odpowiedzi do @punypony @Nate_Cohn
Well said. This is exactly what I was thinking. I've been doing a fair amount of reading about FDR lately. It turns out, when you say you're going to help people & pass legislation that helps the majority of the country, they re-elect you.
3 odpowiedzi 4 podane dalej 24 polubione -
Are you also reading about FDR's VP, Wallace?
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
Wallace to me seemed to be a necessary prerequisite to balancing out FDR's ticket to make him more palatable to the Southern Democrats, but he was very much a reluctant spectator in the White House almost from the very beginning. Is this more or less how you understand it?
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony -
W odpowiedzi do to @Dudeguyy@tomalclay i jeszcze
Excuse me, I was thinking of John Nance Garner, the Texan. What did you have to say about Wallace?
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do to @Dudeguyy@tomalclay i jeszcze
This is Wallace. And by his definition, both parties today are fascist. There's no point in electing Democrats if they are pro-war, pro-Wall St, pro mass-incarceration, anti-universal-healthcare, etc. Vote principles, not parties.pic.twitter.com/GQW7dA2l1y
3 odpowiedzi 4 podane dalej 8 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do to @RealSteveCox@Dudeguyy i jeszcze
I agree: vote principles, not parties. Who supports affordable or free education? Affordable healthcare? Living wage? Women's health freedom? I'll vote for those who have these principles.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych
Me. Without wavering, and without question. And without having to ask any party or corporate donor's permission.
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.