Excuse me, I was thinking of John Nance Garner, the Texan. What did you have to say about Wallace?
-
-
W odpowiedzi do to @Dudeguyy@tomalclay i jeszcze
This is Wallace. And by his definition, both parties today are fascist. There's no point in electing Democrats if they are pro-war, pro-Wall St, pro mass-incarceration, anti-universal-healthcare, etc. Vote principles, not parties.pic.twitter.com/GQW7dA2l1y
3 odpowiedzi 4 podane dalej 8 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do to @RealSteveCox@Dudeguyy i jeszcze
FDR opposed the corrupt Democratic machine of Tammany Hall AND the Republicans who sought to undermine his progressive vision. Throwing the baby out with the bathwater is for lightweights and amateurs. Genuine reformers work within the system, opposing ALL corruption.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do to @DrGaryNGoodman@Dudeguyy i jeszcze
That's not true. A few months after Wallace wrote that in the New York Times, the Democratic Party replaced him as FDR's running mate at the Dem National Conv because he was too friendly to labor and to hostile to business. So when FDR died in early 1945, we got Truman instead.
4 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do to @RealSteveCox@Dudeguyy i jeszcze
If you look at the history of labor laws and support for the working class, that has always been driven by Democrats. Blaming the entire Democratic party only augments the Limbaugh talking points and alienates potential allies. Let's talk policies & specifics, not bash parties
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do to @DrGaryNGoodman@Dudeguyy i jeszcze
Again, I think you have your history wrong. Democrats were the right wing when the Whigs became too similar to the Democrats and were replaced by a new, progressive party called the Republican Party in the 1860s. 1/
3 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do to @RealSteveCox@DrGaryNGoodman i jeszcze
This is former Republican president Teddy Roosevelt:pic.twitter.com/UOUBZ0NxLc
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do to @RealSteveCox@DrGaryNGoodman i jeszcze
Then, over time, lines shifted. Democrats moved left, Republicans moved right, but there were still many left-wing Republicans and right-wing Democrats. For example: 3/?pic.twitter.com/JaI7Eh5c1u
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do to @RealSteveCox@DrGaryNGoodman i jeszcze
The last president to institute meaningful price controls on goods or services in the US, to benefit the middle class and poor, was Richard Nixon. Since at least 1992, the Democratic Party has been majority right-wing. They're not our friends. They just talk like they are. End
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do to @RealSteveCox@Dudeguyy i jeszcze
Nixon instituted price controls because Libertarian economics ALWAYS results in economic collapse. Nixon was trying to slow inflation...around the same time as he allowed healthcare financing to be for-profit...and he broke the law. Nixon was the 1st openly criminal President.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych
Yet where are Democrats instituting price controls?
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.