The Democrats knew the Republicans would ultimately have the votes because they're the majority. But the Dems only wanted to talk about Russia. Don't you wonder why? Dems didn't truly *want* to stop the GOP tax-reform bill. And they didn't. https://www.cnbc.com/2017/12/18/democrats-failed-to-give-tax-reform-proper-attention-commentary.html …
-
-
W odpowiedzi do @RealSteveCox
Yes. Because if you don't confront the underlying corruption (treason), anything else is lipstick on a pig. Besides, blaming Democrats for being ineffective in an environment of FOX/Breitbart + GOP lies is like blaming the defenders of the Alamo for losing that battle.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @DrGaryNGoodman
There are reasons - all of which are the Democratic Party's fault - that the Democrats are outnumbered in congress.
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @RealSteveCox @DrGaryNGoodman
And to follow that, if Dems did their job and consistently spoke up about this tax bill, it could've motivated people to pressure their reps to *not* vote for it. But they didn't. All they did was continue their ridiculous Russia narrative.
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @RealSteveCox
"It could've motivated people to pressure their reps..." is a statement of hope and fantasy, and it continues the trend of blaming Democrats for not stopping Republicans. Blaming Democrats for not stopping Republicans ignores reality: GOP owns all power today.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @DrGaryNGoodman
They own the power *because the Democratic Party has sold us out for so long that they've lost over 1000 seats nationwide the last eight years.*
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @RealSteveCox
Blaming the victims of the obstruction is the same as supporting those who obstruct. Even though I am not a Democrat I can see which party tried to help the working class, and I support those who support the People.pic.twitter.com/KnD4DTpHWV
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @DrGaryNGoodman
I know they wanted to block him. But here are things Obama *chose* to do: Have almost his entire cabinet chosen for him by Citigroup Not jail a single banker Jail more whistleblowers than all prev presidents *combined* Expand the war to 7 countries 1/
3 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @RealSteveCox @DrGaryNGoodman
Have his DEA perform more raids on state-legal medical marijuana businesses in his first 4.5 years than were performed in the previous 12 years combined Pass healthcare legislation designed as a handout to the healthcare lobby at the expense of the middle class 2/
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @RealSteveCox @DrGaryNGoodman
Increased funding to militarize police his first budget by almost 5 times the previous amount. Brokered more arms deals with foreign governments than ANY PRESIDENT SINCE WWII. Despite acknowledging truth of climate change, INCREASED DOMESTIC OIL PRODUCTIONS to record levels 3/
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych
Presided over a never-before-seen increase in domestic surveillance of Americans. Planned a trade deal with Asia to destroy what's left of good, American manufacturing jobs. And there's much more. These he did by his own choice. How do you justify them? 4/4
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.