Steve CoxKonto zweryfikowane

Dems had many chances to do something on net neutrality and never did. They'd structure the tax thing differently and donitvthrough loopholes, end result the same. Abortion is due to religion, not party.

I don't feel like anything you just rebutted any of my examples. You basically just said you disagree with my interpretation. So, we're back to agree to disagree.

I rebutted all three.

1. dems didn't have to do anything to support net neutrality, other than not challenge it 2. There's no way a dem controlled congress passes a tax bill with the same effects 2. Regardless of why, more dems are supportive of abortion rights, so it matters

2) Again, Dems give breaks through tax loopholes. All it takes is an accountant and you get the same exact effect. 3) The SCOTUS ruled on this already. It's not going to change.

2. Not the part where the bill makes cuts to other programs that actually help people in order to offset some of the deficit. And this is before they go after entitlements 3. Thank you for bringing up SCOTUS. A majority dem SC tends to arrive at different judgments than maj repub

That's not to say that dem picks to the Supreme Court are great--even Garland was bleh-- but partisanship seems to have infected every level of govt, so that it's impossible for it not to matter which party is in charge.