Live interview generic ballot polls in December CNN D+18 Quinnipiac D+15 Monmouth D+15 Marist D+13 POS (R) D+12 NBC/WSJ D+11
-
Excuse me, I was thinking of John Nance Garner, the Texan. What did you have to say about Wallace?
This is Wallace. And by his definition, both parties today are fascist. There's no point in electing Democrats if they are pro-war, pro-Wall St, pro mass-incarceration, anti-universal-healthcare, etc. Vote principles, not parties.pic.twitter.com/GQW7dA2l1y
-
-
I agree with what he said. But I reject the notion both parties are the same. Certainly, Democrats have their own issues to work on. But certainly not of the same level of what the GOP is currently displaying. They will get there. I fear the GOP will not.
-
The parties are certainly not homogeneous either. Just a lot more bad in the GOP.
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
-
-
FDR opposed the corrupt Democratic machine of Tammany Hall AND the Republicans who sought to undermine his progressive vision. Throwing the baby out with the bathwater is for lightweights and amateurs. Genuine reformers work within the system, opposing ALL corruption.
-
That's not true. A few months after Wallace wrote that in the New York Times, the Democratic Party replaced him as FDR's running mate at the Dem National Conv because he was too friendly to labor and to hostile to business. So when FDR died in early 1945, we got Truman instead.
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
-
-
I agree: vote principles, not parties. Who supports affordable or free education? Affordable healthcare? Living wage? Women's health freedom? I'll vote for those who have these principles.
-
Me. Without wavering, and without question. And without having to ask any party or corporate donor's permission.
Koniec rozmowy
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.