Steve CoxKonto zweryfikowane

And the point here is that this is billed as a tax cut got everybody, when it's *only* a tax cut for people who don't need a tax cut.

Tax cuts can’t, for obvious reasons, be the same for wealthier people than average working class especially if the person making a substantial amount of money are in fact the ones that provide the jobs for the working class.

"Job creators" aren't a real thing. The market creates the jobs. Giving tax breaks to the wealthy does *not* create jobs. Never has.

I know what my boss pays in taxes for a couple employees, and if he can get a tax break for providing me a job and maybe turn the tax break into a raise for the employees or bettering the business for the employees or maybe even insurance for his employees it’s a win win.

Again, tax breaks don't do that. Tax breaks increase net profits, not need to hire people, nor need to increase their pay or benefits.

It cuts down what they pay in taxes, which in return lets the business have more money for the business.

People are hired based on NEED. People are paid based on how much they NEED to be paid. It's not charity. The tax breaks go into their pockets.

Yes, I agree with that. Why would someone hire someone if they weren’t needed? Good argument, agree to disagree on good points