Steve CoxKonto zweryfikowane

I advocate for 80% federal income tax in the top bracket. But 18% is still too much for healthcare as a percentage of GDP.

Taxable income is only part of the equation. Federal spending on the DoD is a major chunk of our costs (well over 50% now), as an example. There are corporate tax loopholes that need closed. Lots of ways to trim the fat.

The point I'm trying to make is that what you're proposing, while altruistic and a fantastic end-goal, just won't happen without taking that first Medicare-for-all step. It's too big a change, and people aren't on board, nor are the enormous lobbies against it.

Feel free to advocate for whatever you feel is necessary. Just don't expect the level of support necessary to succeed with that particular stance. It's just not in the cards right now.

Hate to break it to you, but Medicare-For-All isn't going to happen even as-is for exactly the reasons you just detailed. Anybody who receives any corporate donations must be voted out. Only then can things get done. As for popular support, that's what leaders bring.

No, they're supporting it because they want to run for president (most of them) and they know it won't pass. Same as the California Assembly in 2006.