Well, I certainly wouldn't want him on leftist platforms. The risk of refusing dialog on his platform, on *this* issue, is you leave it open for inaccurate takes on what UH is about. UH is the issue of our time, and we need all the help we can get to make it happen.
-
Ten tweet jest niedostępny.
-
Ten tweet jest niedostępny.
-
Price controls?! They are now forbidden from negotiating lower prices. Thank you bought Congress. The VA gets way lower prices because they arent forbidden. How about we just correct this as opposed to siding with more profiteering?
Nobody is siding with profiteering. Most of Western Europe does NOT utilize single-payer, but ALL of Western Europe has everybody covered (i.e. "Universal") for around 12% of GDP or less. As I said in my first post about this, single-payer *might* be the answer.
-
-
But no matter what, we need EVERYONE covered and it needs to be in the ballpark of 12% of GDP to do so. Those are the important points. Single-payer at 18% of GDP, or slightly less, will not last. It'll get thrown out like the ACA is about to be.
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
-
-
I understand that. I am just clarifying the reason our drug prices are high. I would be happy with any form of universal care over what we do now. Med for All is more workable since we have mechanisms already in place.
-
Right. But it's not good enough. Compromising on moral or ethical issues is itself a moral problem. Healthcare is a right. Denying rights because of income is wrong. We need to do this right, because if we do, it'll work. And if it works, it will last.
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
-
-
……………are you not at this moment siding with profiteering
Dziękujemy. Twitter skorzysta z tych informacji, aby Twoja oś czasu bardziej Ci odpowiadała. CofnijCofnij
-
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.