Steve CoxKonto zweryfikowane

Ok, tell me specifically who was exposed by either of the two mentioned. I'll wait here.

Did you read what I wrote? If you expose a source or method that allows you to collect intel and those who would do us harm stop using whatever tech or stop doing what they were doing, we are now essentially blind. Get off the self-righteous horse and join the real world.

In the real world, bulk data collection of Americans is the opposite of what America purports to be. In Manning's case, Manning didn't expose people OR tech. Why was Manning jailed and not anybody who did the things Manning exposed?

He divulged classified information. Period. End of. The difference with him is he didn’t run. He had his sentence commuted. Again, some day, when you sign that paper and take the oath to keep secrets, you’ll understand what that means.

Right. So, you said this below, and you ask why Snowden ran? Haha... c'mon. There can be no government secrets in a free society. You can't violate American liberty to protect American liberty. It's impossible. So, pick a side: American liberty, or American subjugation.

One stood up for what he believed was right. He still broke the law. The other ran to an enemy country. Why go there and why do you think they offered him protection?

Doesn't matter. In a free society, Snowden wouldn't have been threatened with jail in the first place. Manning either. You're on the wrong side.

FYI: Wikileaks is an IO mechanism used by Russian intelligence in their campaign against western democracies. You are way out of your depth. Keep reading. If you expand your reading list you might just catch up.