-
-
Whoever gave the stuff to Cernovich could have gone directly to Buzzfeed, or any other news org. That they went to him says everything about motive. Good that it's out, but what DIDN'T come out.
23 odpowiedzi 114 podanych dalej 295 polubionychPokaż ten wątek -
We also seem to have Senate members or staff working to leak to Cernovich. (And maybe Stone.) Not WSJ. Not Fox. Not IJR. Not Free Beacon. And he acts as cutout to Buzzfeed.
34 odpowiedzi 86 podanych dalej 201 polubionychPokaż ten wątek -
I hope we're not about to relive 2016: where material was selectively leaked to news orgs eager for scoops, and only a year later did how media got played come into focus (for some. I mean, seemed clear at the time for some)
13 odpowiedzi 74 podane dalej 214 polubionychPokaż ten wątek -
W odpowiedzi do @ClaraJeffery
Remember that the Wikileaks emails received editing before release. Cernovich is definitely not a credible source for leaks. No telling if he altered the content. Hoping Buzzfeed vetted thoroughly and verified through a separate source as well.
11 odpowiedzi 5 podanych dalej 26 polubionych
Wikileaks emails were not edited. The made-up character Guccifer 2.0 edited an email, but it wasn't in the Wikileaks emails. Which actually serves as evidence G2.0 wasn't the source of the emails Wikileaks released. Stop listening to liars.
-
Pokaż pozostałe odpowiedzi, również te, które mogą zawierać nieodpowiednie treści
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.