Okay first caveat when reviewing these stats: “With less than 5% of the world’s population, the United States is home to roughly 35–50 per cent of the world’s civilian-owned guns, heavily skewing the global geography of firearms and any relative comparison”
My statistics are 100% accurate as of 2012. You're calling the stats flawed because they don't meet your preconceptions.
-
-
Nope because they are flawed
-
Ok, please detail the flaws for me.
Koniec rozmowy
Nowa rozmowa -
-
-
It’s not that the data is flawed, it is your logic in trying to defend your position, that guns are of no consequence when it comes to measuring mass shootings in the US. Because that was the ORIGINAL topic of discussion & that guns are more accessible in the US than healthcare
-
I never claimed guns are "of no consequence." I'm saying the primary factors for gun violence *anywhere*, including here, are socioeconomic. And the good data I provided shows it both by comparison to the US *and* comparison between *any* other countries on earth.
Koniec rozmowy
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.