Steve CoxKonto zweryfikowane

We're talking about France and England, not France and the US. How about this? I'll give you the link below to my source on those numbers... 1/2

They're below. Now, please show me ANY COUNTRY ON THE PLANET (outside of places where we can't trust the government numbers such as NK and China) with worse socioeconomics than the US and less gun homicides. Deal? I'll wait here. https://amp.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2012/jul/22/gun-homicides-ownership-world-list … 2/2

Well you better give me half an hour to go through all that....

Take all the time you need. I went through it already. I know the result.

Okay first caveat when reviewing these stats: “With less than 5% of the world’s population, the United States is home to roughly 35–50 per cent of the world’s civilian-owned guns, heavily skewing the global geography of firearms and any relative comparison”

Yep. And if gun ownership was the *cause* of gun homicides, we'd have an equivalent number of gun homicides as compared to the rest of the world. But again, I'm looking for any country with worse socioeconomics and a lower gun-homicide rate. Those are the two stats.

So that is your takeaway from this information? I am assuming you look at the gun homicide rate of 2.97 per 100,000 people in the US which is very low in comparison to the number of guns owned in the US.

So comparison of gun ownership in France & that they have a gun homicide rate of 0.06 per 100,000 but an assumption that the country has better socio-economic conditions because based on the number of guns in France they are not killing each other to same degree as Americans?