Some people will act differently while holding *any* kind of weapon, I'd imagine. I think that was definitely the case with that idiot Zimmerman. But I don't think it's a general truth.
-
-
I think generalizing was the thrust of the study, but I'd have to reread (or find it). Generally, people were more confrontational, etc when carrying a gun. Not sure if weapons in general were differentiated, but no doubt people were more confident with any weapon than without
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
I'd love to see the study. People generally are going to be more confident if they feel they're at an advantage.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
This wasn't what I remember, but it is the first thing I found...haven't finished reading it yet, but in the interest of sharing... https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/get-psyched/201301/the-weapons-effect …
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do to @FJforAll@RealSteveCox i jeszcze
Another article...different set of studies https://science.howstuffworks.com/does-owning-a-gun-change-your-behavior-.htm …
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
Those both used the same study from 50 years ago. Weapons are *supposed* to change your behavior. If someone breaks into your house, with a gun you'll be more likely to step up and stop them rather than cower in your room. You know?
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
They both reference other studies too, right? I'm not sure they are supposed to impact your decision making in the ways the studies describe. Or if they are, that that is a good thing.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
It's a matter of the confidence of a perceived advantage. This would happen to some professional fighters in bars, body builders, people who know martial arts... It's not a gun thing, it's a people thing.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
That's a fine assumption. It makes sense. Not sure I agree it is that simple, but these are just opinions. As to a fighter in a bar, to me that's a bit silly. Lots harder to become that fighter than owning a gun, efficacy of gun damage far greater to more people...
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do to @FJforAll@RealSteveCox i jeszcze
The fighter may share the same bravado and violence-prone decision making, but the impact is lessened by the required intimacy of fist-violence (unless you are the target I suppose)
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych
This is a very small percentage of the overall gun-violence problem regardless. Gun violence is mostly due to gang activity (usually related to illicit drugs), property crime, and domestic violence. And in the latter category, guns can serve as equalizers.
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.