You know what else is paid for with tax money? Aircraft carriers. But I can’t hold a parade on one.
-
-
Strawman anybody?
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
If you’re suggesting aircraft carriers aren’t streets, then I understand your response. But it’s not a straw man argument. Both are paid for by tax money. Since you’re having trouble with that one, I also cannot have a parade on the highway. Time, place, manner.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony -
Right to assembly and right to free speech are rights in public. The deck of an aircraft carrier is not "public" strictly speaking. Roads are. Sidewalks are. Thus: Strawman. Creating an easy argument that you can defeat rather than addressing actual points presented.
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
There is nothing about reasonable gun regulations that causes an unreasonable burden on the rights of legitimate gun owners. Because that’s what we do. We balance the rights - even the constitutional rights - of individuals with a legitimate government purpose.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony -
No, that's not what we do. We suppress rights and oppress people to benefit the wealthy and powerful. You're confusing what we "should" do with what we "actually" do.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
Steve, I’m not in the slightest bit confused. And now you’ve presented a new argument. One I don’t necessarily disagree with. But it has zero to do with gun regulations.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
It has everything to do with gun regulations.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
Steve, I’ve now read your webpage and we agree on many issues. I would encourage you to spend more time researching gun violence. Gun violence isn’t rooted in socioeconomics. That’s fiction. And we can curtail much of the carnage with better background checks. That’s fact.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
Both of those things are false. I'm trying to actually fix the problem. You guys are trying to get rid of the scary thing you don't like. That's the difference. If you read my section on guns, you'll see how I detail and cite sources. Good sources. I'm right.
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych
Here's the truth of background checks - which I support - for example:http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2017/oct/11/seth-moulton/have-background-checks-been-unequivocally-shown-re/ …
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.